Why DNS TXT Records Deserve Governance in Security Programs

DNS TXT records play a critical role in modern cloud environments. They underpin email authentication, domain ownership verification, SaaS onboarding, and even security tooling integrations. Despite their importance, TXT records are rarely governed, audited, or lifecycle-managed. 

This gap has enabled real-world security incidents ranging from email spoofing and brand impersonation to SaaS account takeovers and covert data exfiltration. This blog examines why TXT records represent a growing cloud security blind spot and outlines governance controls that cloud security programs should adopt. 

Why TXT Records Matter More Than Ever 

Originally designed for arbitrary text, DNS TXT records have evolved into control-plane primitives for cloud and SaaS ecosystems. 

Common uses include: 

• Email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) 
• Cloud and SaaS domain ownership verification 
• CI/CD, analytics, and monitoring integrations 
• Policy signalling and metadata exchange 

In effect, TXT records now act as implicit trust anchors across cloud services. 

 

Real-World Abuse Patterns Involving TXT Records

1. Email Spoofing Through Weak or Stale SPF Records

SPF, defined entirely through TXT records, is frequently weakened over time due to: 

• Excessive include: statements 
• Forgotten third-party vendors 
• Multiple SPF records causing evaluation errors 

Attackers have exploited these misconfigurations to send spoofed emails that pass SPF checks, enabling phishing campaigns without compromising mail infrastructure. 

2. SaaS Account Takeover via Orphaned TXT Verification

Many SaaS platforms rely on TXT records to verify domain ownership. Once verified, these records are rarely revalidated. 

Attack pattern: 

1. Organization verifies domain using TXT 
2. SaaS service is decommissioned 
3. TXT record remains 
4. Attacker re-registers the service and claims the domain 

This has led to: 

• Unauthorized access to SaaS configurations 
• Brand impersonation 
• Abuse of trusted domains for phishing or fraud 

3. DNS-Based Command-and-Control and Data Exfiltration

Advanced threat actors have repeatedly leveraged DNS (including TXT responses) for: 

• Command delivery 
• Low-volume data exfiltration 
• Bypassing egress controls 

TXT records are especially attractive because: 

• DNS is almost universally allowed outbound 
• TXT payloads blend into legitimate traffic 
• Inspection of DNS payload content is often minimal 

 

Why TXT Records Escape Traditional Security Controls 

DNS TXT records fall into a governance gap because they do not clearly align with existing security domains. They are not governed by identity and access controls, excluded from secrets management, and often missing from asset inventories. Changes to TXT records are rarely monitored or audited, and ownership or expiry is typically undefined. 

As a result, most CSPM, SSPM, and IAM tools do not treat DNS TXT records as security-sensitive assets, despite their real-world impact. 

 

TXT Records as a DNS Security Governance Problem 

From a CSA-aligned perspective, TXT record risk maps to several governance domains: 

• Configuration Management – No baseline enforcement 
• Third-Party Risk – Persistent trust in decommissioned vendors 
• Identity Assurance – Domain-level identity misuse 
• Detection & Monitoring – Limited visibility into changes or abuse 

This positions TXT records as a DNS security posture management (DNSPM) challenge rather than a purely operational DNS issue. 

 

Recommended Controls for TXT Record Governance 

Organizations should treat TXT records as first-class security assets, applying controls similar to credentials and certificates: 

1. Comprehensive Inventory 
   • Enumerate all TXT records across domains and subdomains 
2. Classification 
   • Email authentication 
   • SaaS verification 
   • Unknown or undocumented records 
3. Lifecycle Enforcement 
   • Ownership tagging 
   • Expiry or periodic revalidation 
   • Decommissioning workflows
4. Security Hygiene Checks 
   • SPF complexity and validity 
   • DMARC enforcement posture 
   • Detection of high-entropy values 
5. Change Monitoring 
   • Historical tracking 
   • Alerting on unauthorized modifications 

 

Conclusion 

TXT records were never designed to carry the security weight they now bear. However, modern cloud architectures depend on them for trust, identity, and control signaling. 

Ignoring TXT records in cloud security programs leaves a critical gap—one that attackers have already demonstrated how to exploit. 

This is precisely where DNS Security Posture Management (DNSPM) becomes essential. CheckRed’s DNSPM treats TXT records as first-class security assets by continuously discovering all DNS records across environments, classifying their purpose, monitoring for drift or unauthorized changes, and enforcing lifecycle controls such as ownership, validation, and decommissioning. 

By bringing visibility, governance, and continuous monitoring to TXT records, DNSPM closes a blind spot that traditional CSPM, SSPM, and IAM tools overlook—helping organizations prevent trust abuse before it turns into an incident. 

As cloud security matures, DNS TXT governance must evolve from an operational afterthought into a foundational security control—and DNSPM is the mechanism that makes that possible. 

 

About the Author

Chaturbhuj Singh

Chaturbhuj is Director of Cloud Security Engineering at CheckRed, leading strategy, architecture, and execution for enterprise-grade security solutions across Cloud, SaaS, and DNS. With deep expertise in vulnerability management, misconfiguration remediation, and automated risk reduction, he drives the engineering vision behind CheckRed’s unified security platform – enhancing visibility, compliance, and resilience across complex hybrid environments.